But nobody is talking about this ;)
Someone from a left libertarian instance: I don't think you can end the idea of ownership as long as scarcity exists.
Me (toning down my "8 heads in a duffle" speech): Robin Hood could make 99% of the world 50x wealthier by robbing only 8 men. I think the relationship between ownership and scarcity is not as you think.
Left libertarian: (Canned thing about you can't rob the rich)
Me (goes away scratching my head)
@AceNovo we are reaching (maybe sliping passed) a point were (in the western counterys) the are meany more goods than needs - we live in post scarcety allready, its the distribution that is the problem.
Capitalism is past the point of thinking of itself as a system for production and distribution and has been since the commercialization of electricity. It's about capturing value, which means obstructing distribution - DRM, "loss prevention," metered services, pay walls, and fighting "socialism" in government (social safety nets and taxes that affect the wealthy)
@AceNovo what would it look like to step away from this mess.
That's where the left starts squabbling. 😎
There are strong opinions and a lot of work needs to be done to composite those into systems. Also, the systems designed by those who've lived under Capitalism our whole lives will set precedents for what comes after, but will contain assumptions that need to be reevaluated later.
A lot of ideas revolve around contracts, and did even before blockchain. We can build communities around these ideas now.
The way we find out what it would look like to step away from capitalism is to do it. Mutual aid organizations, coops, communes, unions and guilds are a step or a half step in that direction.
I'm looking at ways to simulate intentional communities and contract economies in virtual worlds, games, because there are limits to testing social and economic ideas in real life - like time, material needs, and privacy.
I thought I remembered there being more links in your bio at one point.
So "What does this look like?" was probably meant to be more personal than hypothetical, but I do feel very strongly that we don't have the tools or environments yet to make strong assertions here. I want real world efforts to succeed, but it's more important to have experiences documented and preserved so that we can learn from them.
Founded on #4opens and moderated by an ethical code of conduct. Its a safe space for Campaigning and NGO groups to access their members via #openweb projects.
"We can't engage as communities, unless we have money. I can't even express how angry this makes me."
- an activist group using Facebook. People and organisations who feel this way are our initial targets.
We are launching two new Mastodon instances for activists and campaigners to aid communication of grassroot groups; putting social media back in our hands by providing a free, unfettered home for campaigners, NGO’s and activists to communicate among their peers and beyond.
This project is a way out of the restricted, algorithmic, for-profit mediation and commercialisation of communication we increasingly experience. If you do not pay to "boost" each post, a Facebook page will only reach 3-6% of members. This soon becomes an expensive drain on limited NGO and activist budgets.
Activists and campaigners alike are ready to shift their outreach away from the corporate social networks paid-per-view “walled gardens”.
Mastodon is the worlds largest free open source decentralised microblogging network; it’s thousands of unique, interconnected communities, filled with different people, interests, languages, and needs.
You’re free to join any community you like, or better yet, host your own, on your own terms. It remains possible for members of each to instance to interact with others.
There is no monopoly by a single commercial company, no ads, and no tracking.
We aim to help activism/campaigning groups to make this step now.
A note on Security and Privacy - these take a somewhat different shape within the #openweb. Have a read about our thoughts on the matter.